Trove
Sign In Sign Up

White Plains courthouse

Location
Mentions
8
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00020657.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page39 of 208 A-35 2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6 reference to the test articul...

Court docket report (sdny cm/ecf)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 21-22, 2021. It details legal maneuvers regarding pretrial scheduling, the severance of perjury counts from non-perjury counts, and the deferral of suppression motions. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants government requests for redactions to protect the privacy of third parties and alleged victims.

Court docket sheet
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002833.jpg

This document is page 12 of a court filing (Document 859) dated March 24, 2021, from a criminal case involving a defendant named Schulte (likely Joshua Schulte, though found in a DOJ release). The text outlines the court's rejection of the defendant's arguments regarding venue impropriety, affirming that it is constitutional to indict in one courthouse (White Plains) and try in another (Manhattan) within the same district. The court cites the COVID-19 pandemic delays in Summer 2020 as further justification for the procedural flexibility.

Legal filing / court order (page 12 of 20)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002824.jpg

This document is page 3 of a court filing (likely an opinion or order) in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548). It discusses Schulte's motion to dismiss his indictment regarding the alleged transmission of national defense information to WikiLeaks. Schulte argues that the White Plains grand jury venire violated his constitutional rights by failing to represent a fair cross-section of African American and Hispanic American populations. Note: While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the text exclusively concerns Joshua Schulte; however, this document may be part of a larger FOIA production covering SDNY cases or MCC New York issues.

Court filing (order/opinion regarding motion to dismiss)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search