An attorney argues against a lengthy hearing on the defendant's assets for detention purposes, citing a precedent from Judge Raggi. The attorney also states that upcoming legal motions will affect the indictment and should be considered by the court when weighing the evidence for the bail decision.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, capturing an attorney's argument during a bail hearing. The attorney contends that stringent bail conditions can mitigate flight risk without a prolonged hearing on the defendant's assets, citing an observation by Judge Raggi in a previous case. The attorney also informs the presiding judge of forthcoming significant motions that could challenge the indictment itself, urging the court to consider this when weighing the evidence for the bail determination.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication