unnamed attorney
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Clients
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
presiding judge
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Meder
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client/Witness
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Courtney Wild
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim 4
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FAUSA Sloman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Witness examiner |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Law Partner
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit filed by attorney against Epstein for malicious prosecution. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Cross-examination | A witness named Rocchio is being cross-examined in court about their note-taking practices. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Meeting | Meetings were held with a witness from the financial institution. | Unknown | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of witness Meder regarding the source of photographs in a legal case (1:20-cr-0... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A court session was adjourned for the day because an attorney involved in the case became ill and... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A court hearing where attorneys argued the admissibility of testimony regarding a stain found on ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | An attorney raises an issue of potential witness tampering, where one witness called another (Bri... | courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court adjournment | A court session was adjourned for the day because an attorney involved in the case became ill and... | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Meeting | Meetings were held with a witness from the financial institution, attended by an attorney for tha... | Not specified | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Bail hearing | An attorney presents arguments to a judge regarding bail conditions, detention, and the weight of... | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2020-02-10 | Court hearing | A defense attorney presents an argument to a judge requesting an adjournment to allow more time f... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Legal proceeding | An attorney is making an argument in court regarding the circumstances of Jeffrey Epstein's death... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-23 | Meeting | From 12:40pm to at least 1:00pm, Inmate Epstein was meeting with his attorney. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Witness spoke with an attorney but did not hire one at that time. | Unknown | View |
EFTA00034883.pdf
An email dated July 12, 2019, with the subject line referring to 'Tartaglione conditions/visits'. The sender instructs Lieutenants (likely at the correctional facility) to ensure a legal visit occurs without issues and that the inmate is ready for his attorney. The document contains heavy redactions regarding the sender and recipients.
EFTA00034747.pdf
This document is an email thread dated July 27, 2019, discussing the status of Inmate Jeffrey Epstein. It confirms that Epstein was assessed by a psychologist prior to an attorney visit and would remain on 'Psychological Observation,' with a follow-up assessment scheduled for the next day. The names of the senders and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00034523.pdf
A brief internal note or email excerpt reporting that the subject (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) was released from 'Psych Ops' on July 30. It notes an attorney visit began at 8:20am and lasted all day, with a promise to send the attorney log next.
EFTA00019658.pdf
An email chain from November 30, 2018, discussing various legal actions involving Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondents clarify the nature of a specific lawsuit in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, identifying it as a malicious prosecution suit filed against Epstein by an attorney who represented Epstein's victims. The discussion distinguishes this case from the victims' suit against the government regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). An attachment 'Plaintiff's_Motion_08_Civ_80736.pdf' is provided as an example of motion practice.
DOJ-OGR-00018117.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of testimony. An attorney objects to an agent's testimony about finding a stain resembling semen on a massage table during a search on October 20, 2005, arguing it is prejudicial and irrelevant as it was found a year after the alleged conspiracy ended in 2004. Attorney Ms. Comey counters that the testimony will be brief and clinical, merely describing the agent's observation.
DOJ-OGR-00017686.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys and a judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The core issue is whether questions about a $25 million settlement demand, made by the witness in a civil case, are admissible under Rule 408 to show bias, particularly as the demand was made while a related criminal case against Ms. Maxwell was pending. Attorney Ms. Menninger argues the questions are proper to show bias, while attorney Ms. Moe seeks to limit the scope of the examination.
DOJ-OGR-00014972.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on January 15, 2025. The questioning focuses on the witness's note-taking practices during prior interviews with the government. Rocchio admits to taking temporary notes on topics like "grooming" to research later and then discarding them, but confirms maintaining a file related to their retention in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00014886.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript (Document 782, filed Jan 15, 2025) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who defines 'interpersonal violence' and 'forensic psychology' for the court. Rocchio also testifies to having completed between 500 and 1,000 hours of clinical face-to-face work with patients during their Master's and Ph.D. studies.
DOJ-OGR-00008318.jpg
This court transcript from December 10, 2021, captures a discussion where attorney Ms. Moe informs the court of a potential conflict of interest. Ms. Moe explains that prospective Juror No. 93 is an attorney at the same financial institution where a key trial witness is an executive director, and that this issue has also been flagged for the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001015.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on April 1, 2021. During the hearing, the defendant, after confirming consultation with their attorney, waives the public reading of the indictment and pleads not guilty. The court accepts the plea and then transitions to a scheduling conference, instructing the government's representative, Ms. Moe, to provide a status update on discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00000672.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). An attorney representing victims addresses the court, thanking the Judge and the U.S. Attorney's office for their treatment of the victims. The attorney introduces Courtney Wild, a client who sought help in 2008, to speak to the court; Ms. Wild then spells her name for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00018639.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Meder by an attorney. The questioning focuses on clarifying the source of certain photographs, with the attorney confirming that Meder's testimony was that the photos were taken from CDs, not from a wall where they might have been displayed in a house.
DOJ-OGR-00019171.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. The judge announces to the jury and counsel that an unnamed attorney in the case is ill and needs care, leading to the adjournment of the court for the day. The judge indicates proceedings are expected to resume the following morning.
DOJ-OGR-00016497.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, related to the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The dialogue is between the Court and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding the admissibility of evidence concerning Ms. Maxwell's residency in London. Everdell argues that title records showing Maxwell owned a property at 69 Stanhope Mews prior to purchasing a residence on Kinnerton Street would prove she was not living at the new location earlier than claimed, while the Court questions why a proffered attorney witness is not present to testify to these facts.
DOJ-OGR-00013084.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony concerns the chain of custody for a specific hard drive seized in July 2007. Flatley admits that when he received the evidence box containing three copies of the drive, the evidence tape was already broken and the box featured a xerox of a different hard drive on the front.
DOJ-OGR-00013588.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the adjournment of a trial. The judge informs the jury that an attorney involved in the case has fallen ill, possibly with COVID, necessitating a break in the proceedings. The court is recessed for the day with the intention of resuming the following morning.
DOJ-OGR-00025408.jpg
A handwritten Suicide Watch Observation Log for inmate Jeffrey Epstein (Reg # 76318-054) dated July 23, 2019. The log records his activities from 10:30 AM to 1:00 PM, noting behaviors such as pacing, resting his head against the wall, eating, washing his neck, and eventually being taken to see his attorney at 12:40 PM. The identities of the observing officers are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00025313.jpg
This document is a Suicide Watch Observation Log for inmate Epstein, Reg # 76318-054, dated July 23, 2019. The log details observations of Epstein's behavior from 10:30am to 1:00pm, including pacing, eating, sitting on his bed, and washing his neck. A significant event noted is Epstein being taken to meet with his attorney at 12:40pm.
DOJ-OGR-00025293.jpg
Internal Bureau of Prisons email correspondence from July 24, 2019, between Regional Director Ray Ormond and Associate Warden Shirley Skipper-Scott regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate #76318-054). The emails confirm Epstein was removed from Suicide Watch and stepped down to Psychological Observation on that date, underwent a medical assessment, and was scheduled to meet with his attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00011629.jpg
This is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In the transcript, an attorney, Ms. Moe, raises a concern to the court about prospective Juror No. 93. Ms. Moe explains that this juror is an attorney at the same financial institution where a key trial witness works as an executive director, creating a potential conflict of interest that has been flagged for both the court and the defense.
Note-taking practices during interviews
An attorney questions a witness named Rocchio about whether they took notes during interviews with the government, what happened to those notes, and whether they maintain a file for the case.
Origin of photographs
An attorney cross-examines the witness, Meder, about the source of photographs. The attorney seeks to clarify whether the photos came from a CD or were taken from a wall in a house. Meder confirms their testimony was about taking photos off CDs.
Bail hearing arguments
An attorney argues against a lengthy hearing on the defendant's assets for detention purposes, citing a precedent from Judge Raggi. The attorney also states that upcoming legal motions will affect the indictment and should be considered by the court when weighing the evidence for the bail decision.
Request for adjournment
A defense attorney argues for an adjournment, stating that their small law firm needs more than the 90 days the federal government took to investigate in order to properly review 25 witness statements and prepare a defense for their clients.
Request for adjournment
A defense attorney argues for an adjournment, stating that their small law firm needs more than the 90 days the federal government took to investigate in order to properly review 25 witness statements and prepare a defense for their clients.
Legal Consultation
At 12:40pm, Epstein was taken to see his attorney. Subsequent log entries at 12:45pm and 1:00pm note he was still with the attorney.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity