📧 Communication

Testimony/Statement

Communication Details

To
Court Court
Date
February 02, 2016
Subject
Non-prosecution logic
Message Content

Reasoning regarding prosecution of other cases if evidence existed, provided Constand deposition wasn't used.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00004840.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing (Exhibit attached to Document 310-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on July 2, 2021. It presents an excerpt from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion ([J-100-2020]) regarding Commonwealth v. Cosby. The text analyzes whether former D.A. Castor had a valid non-prosecution agreement with Bill Cosby, concluding that the interaction was an 'unauthorized contemplation of transactional immunity' that did not comply with Pennsylvania statutes. This legal precedent regarding immunity deals is likely being cited in the Maxwell/Epstein proceedings to argue the validity or invalidity of similar non-prosecution agreements.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication