Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Questions or requests for testimony/information

From: foreperson
To: Court

Communications with the Court, including requests for testimony, should be made in writing, signed by the foreperson, and given to a marshal. The Court will respond promptly.

Written note
N/A
Communication Source

Case arguments

From: the government
To: Court

Referenced by the speaker: 'The government said in its opening brief...'

Opening brief
N/A
Communication Source

Defense Letter (Def. Ltr.)

From: defense
To: Court

Referenced as 'Def. Ltr. at 7', claiming materials were produced without sealing application.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Support for bail

From: Spouse (Redacted)
To: Court

Describing committed relationship with Ms. Maxwell for over four years.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Request for reconsideration (dkt. no. 1078)

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Court

Maxwell requested reconsideration of the unsealing order based on her arrest and indictment.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Closing Arguments/Briefs

From: the government
To: Court

Arguments establishing the 'playbook' pattern and conspiracy.

Legal argument
N/A
Communication Source

Article regarding Islamic aid organizations

From: Plaintiffs
To: Court

Article stating organizations provided funds to terrorists; court refused to admit it to supplement record.

Legal submission
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Memorandum

From: David Parse
To: Court

Parse claimed 'He gave no investment advice, and the trades were executed by his assistant.'

Legal memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: juror
To: Court

A note received in court used as a timeline anchor.

Juror note
N/A
Communication Source

Explanation of questionnaire answers

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Testimony regarding why he answered 'No' to questions about family abuse.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Reply

From: defendant
To: Court

Dkt. No. 42; acknowledged BOP changes but requested court order confirming them.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Response to motion

From: Government officials
To: Court

Dkt. No. 41; stated BOP modified confinement to allow 13 hours/day access to discovery.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot.

From: defendant
To: Court

Argument regarding waiver of right to appeal extradition.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Experts' reports

From: experts
To: Court

Reviewed by the Court regarding flight risk.

Report
N/A
Communication Source

Character reference for bail

From: Maxwell's spouse
To: Court

Describes Maxwell as wonderful and loving, refutes criminal charges, describes domestic life.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Support letters

From: Maxwell's Family Members
To: Court

Describe her home in US and commitment to family.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Affidavit of Jane Doe No. 3

From: JANE DOE NO. 3
To: Court

Cited as Exhibit 8.

Affidavit
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questions (25, 48, 49)

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding history of crime victimization and sexual harassment/abuse accusations.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Jury
To: Court

Described as a 'single ambiguous jury note'.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Tape Erasure

From: Alexander Haig
To: Court

Attributed the erasure to 'sinister forces'.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Decision making regarding immunity

From: Mr. Castor
To: Court

Characterized as equivocal and inconsistent regarding intent (transactional vs use immunity).

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Court
To: juror

Juror filled out a questionnaire regarding knowledge of the case.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Psychological report

From: Psychologist/Expert
To: Court

Discusses impacts of father and brother's death.

Report
N/A
Communication Source

Response in the Epstein case

From: the government
To: Court

Government response filed shortly after May 20, 2011.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Motions in Limine

From: Government officials
To: Court

referenced as using the word 'confused' 24 times.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search