📧 Communication
Courtroom DialogueCommunication Details
From
Ms. Pomerantz
Linked to MS. POMERANTZ
To
The Court
THE COURT
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Clarification of questioning regarding grooming
Message Content
Discussion regarding a distinction between third-party presence and sexual gratification in the context of grooming strategies.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00017941.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This page is a transcript from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a legal argument between attorney Ms. Pomerantz and the Judge regarding the admissibility of questions related to 'grooming' and 'sexual gratification.' The Judge references a 'Daubert context' (expert witness admissibility) and compares the testimony to a 'pimp-prostitute context.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication