A jury questionnaire that Juror 50 filled out, which contained questions about being a victim of a crime (Question 25) and whether he or a family member had been accused of sexual abuse (Question 49). His negative answers are the subject of this legal analysis.
This legal document argues that Juror 50 did not intentionally lie on a jury questionnaire when he failed to disclose childhood sexual abuse. The filing explains that the juror did not consider the unprosecuted abuse a "crime" and did not initially consider his estranged stepbrother, the abuser, to be a "family member" in the context of the questions. The document contends that a lay juror's interpretation of such questions should not be held to the strict standard of a trained lawyer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication