📧 Communication

Court testimony

Communication Details

From
To
["Ms. Conrad"] ["Ms. Conrad"]
Date
February 15, 2012
Subject
Cross-examination regarding voir dire omissions
Message Content

Mr. Shechtman questions Ms. Conrad about her failure to disclose her husband's criminal history and other details during jury selection. The questioning probes her motives, including the $40/day stipend, her curiosity about the case, and her distinction between an "omission" and a "lie".

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00009950.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad. Attorney Mr. Shechtman questions her about why she made several omissions during jury selection, including failing to disclose her husband's criminal history. The questioning explores her motivations, such as a $40/day juror stipend, unemployment, and an intellectual curiosity for the courtroom, and challenges her distinction between an "omission" and a "lie".

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication