📧 Communication
letterCommunication Details
From
Defense Counsel (Implied)
Linked to Defense counsel (implied)
To
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
Date
August 24, 2020
Subject
Reply regarding government conduct and subpoenas
Message Content
Defense argues against government's characterization of Ms. Maxwell's actions and disputes the 'standard practice' of government subpoenas.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00001764.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This is page 2 of a legal letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 24, 2020, filed in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's characterization of Maxwell's actions as 'cherry-picking' and challenges the government's issuance of subpoenas as not being 'standard practice,' citing Second Circuit case law (Martindell) regarding protective orders and civil discovery. Large portions of the document are redacted.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication