Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Defense counsel (implied)

Person
Mentions
0
Relationships
2
Events
6
Documents
0
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
5
1
View
person Andrew Rohrbach, Lara Pomerantz, Alison Moe, Maureen Comey
Opposing counsel
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2023-02-28 N/A Court hearing regarding sentencing enhancements and objections (Case 22-1426). Courtroom (likely SDNY or S... View
2022-08-10 N/A Sidebar conference during trial testimony Courtroom Sidebar View
2022-07-22 N/A Filing of the court transcript (Page 40 of 101). Southern District Court (Ne... View
2021-01-28 N/A Deadline to submit a letter to Judge Nathan regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-... Southern District of New York View
2008-03-01 N/A Meeting regarding the case arguments. Unknown View
0026-06-01 N/A Meeting regarding the case strategy or negotiations. Unspecified View
No documents found for this entity.
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
37
As Recipient
3
Total
40

Unknown

From: MDC
To: Defense counsel (implied)

Referenced as 'The MDC's letter is insufficient'.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding grooming definitions

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: Rocchio

Discussion regarding the definition of grooming, the witness's lack of specific publications on the topic, and the intent required for an act to be considered grooming.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Resisting the Court and government learning knowledge

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: THE COURT

Parties continued to make it appear and resist the Court and government learning knowledge during conference calls.

Conference calls
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Argument

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding evidence of money moving for a helicopter and Larry Visoski holding assets.

Meeting
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Proposed follow-up questions

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: THE COURT

Questions proposed in a letter about the juror's belief about victim memory.

Letter
2022-03-11
Communication Source

Motion for New Trial / Arguments regarding Juror No. 50

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: THE COURT

Table of contents outlining arguments that Maxwell is entitled to a new trial due to Juror No. 50's false answers during voir dire.

Legal filing
2022-03-11
Communication Source

Motion regarding Juror No. 50's misconduct

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: THE COURT

Argument that Juror No. 50's undisclosed history of child sexual abuse mirrors the case facts and warrants investigation.

Court filing
2022-03-11
Communication Source

Juror Bias Inquiry

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the scope of questioning for Juror No. 50.

Legal filing
2022-03-11
Communication Source

Proposed questions for Juror 50 inquiry

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

List of proposed questions regarding sexual abuse history, advocacy, and therapy to determine juror impartiality.

Letter
2022-03-01
Communication Source

Proposed Questions for Juror 50

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Request for the court to ask specific questions to Juror 50 regarding potential false answers on jury questionnaires.

Legal filing
2022-03-01
Communication Source

Argument regarding juror misconduct and standard of willf...

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: THE COURT

Legal argument asserting that proving 'willfulness' regarding a juror's false answer should not be required for a retrial.

Court filing
2022-02-17
Communication Source

Constructive Amendment / Variance

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Legal argument regarding jury instructions and the S2 Indictment against Ms. Maxwell.

Letter
2021-12-27
Communication Source

Jury Instructions / Constructive Amendment regarding Coun...

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Argument that convicting Maxwell based on New Mexico events would be a constructive amendment of the indictment which specified New York.

Letter
2021-12-27
Communication Source

Jury Instructions / Constructive Amendment Argument

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Legal argument requesting specific jury instructions to prevent conviction based on New Mexico events rather than New York events as charged in the indictment.

Letter
2021-12-27
Communication Source

Jury Instructions / Jury Note

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Legal argument regarding jury confusion on Counts Two and Four, specifically concerning jurisdiction and conduct in New Mexico.

Letter
2021-12-27
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 525

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Arguments regarding the exclusion of 'highly mobile' evidence (massage tables, artwork) and 2019 photographs.

Legal letter/filing
2021-12-05
Communication Source

Evidentiary Objections

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Arguments against admitting photos of vibrators, stuffed animals, and interior shots of Epstein's apartment.

Letter
2021-12-05
Communication Source

Reciprocal Discovery Request

From: Audrey Strauss
To: Defense counsel (implied)

Government reiterating requests for reciprocal discovery under Rule 16(b) and witness statements under Rule 26.2.

Legal letter/filing
2021-10-29
Communication Source

Motion to dismiss based on Cosby precedent

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Argument that the government is violating due process by reneging on the NPA, citing the vacating of Bill Cosby's conviction.

Legal letter/motion
2021-07-02
Communication Source

RE: US v Maxwell - [conferrals regarding pretrial disclos...

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: Government Counsel (im...

Sending attached letter to be filed; confirms no redactions sought by defense in follow-up to previous email.

Email
2021-04-20
Communication Source

RE: US v Maxwell - [conferrals regarding pretrial disclos...

From: Government Counsel (im...
To: Defense counsel (implied)

Detailed position on redactions for Reply Briefs 1, 3, 5, 6, and 10, and associated exhibits.

Email
2021-04-20
Communication Source

Motion to Seal / Privacy Concerns

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Argument for sealing documents to protect sureties from harassment, citing specific social media threats.

Letter
2020-11-25
Communication Source

Argument regarding relationship between civil and crimina...

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: Court

Legal argument stating the cases are related due to perjury allegations.

Legal filing
2020-09-23
Communication Source

Motion to Consolidate

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: THE COURT

Argument in favor of consolidating cases and refuting claims that it will cause delay.

Legal filing
2020-09-23
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 54

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Argument regarding the modification of protective orders in the Maxwell case.

Letter
2020-08-24
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search