Two 'independent ethics opinions', one by Joe Whitley, assessing improprieties in the federal investigation of Epstein, and another by a retired federal judge/U.S. Attorney, arguing against NPA's use of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 for civil damages recovery.
This document details the efforts of Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in December 2007 to challenge the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the federal investigation. It describes how defense counsel Starr and Lefkowitz sent letters and 'ethics opinions' to Acosta, criticizing the investigation and accusing an individual named Villafaña of improper conduct and federal overreaching, while Epstein reaffirmed his acceptance of the NPA.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication