Asserted it was 'wholly inappropriate' for the USAO to send the proposed victim notification letter and urged Acosta to withhold it.
Response to Acosta's letter, with copies to Sloman and Assistant Attorney General Fisher, on the day after Acosta's letter was received.
Informing them of a thorough review and belief that intervention by Deputy Attorney General was not warranted, and that federal prosecution is appropriate.
Starr and Lefkowitz called Acosta to express concern about Oosterbaan's role and indicated they might seek more senior involvement from the Department.
Pressed objections to USAO's involvement in the Epstein matter.
Lengthy letter reviewing issues discussed at meeting and requesting prompt independent review
Lengthy letter reviewing meeting issues, advising Epstein sought expedited review, and reiterating Epstein's position on registrable offense and damages.
Two 'independent ethics opinions', one by Joe Whitley, assessing improprieties in the federal investigation of Epstein, and another by a retired federal judge/U.S. Attorney, arguing against NPA's use of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 for civil damages recovery.
Starr and Lefkowitz sent a letter to Acosta, with copies to Sloman and Fisher, reaffirming the NPA but taking 'serious issue' with an unspecified matter.
Starr and Lefkowitz sent a letter to Acosta, with copies to Sloman and Assistant Attorney General Fisher, reaffirming the NPA but taking 'serious issue' with something unspecified.
Starr's correspondence with Acosta regarding 'fairly narrow issues'.
After the March 12, 2008 meeting, Starr and Lefkowitz submitted a list of complaints about the USAO's conduct in the Epstein case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity