A note from the jury to the judge, which prompts the discussion. The Court asks for the note back and begins to read the question from it: "Can we consider Annie's testimony as..."
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys and a judge about a jury's question. The core issue is whether the testimony of a witness named 'Annie' can be considered for conspiracy counts, given a prior instruction that her testimony did not describe illegal sexual activity. The judge rules that the testimony is relevant and can be permissibly considered by the jury for those counts.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication