jury (implied)

Person

Mentions

Relationships

Events

Documents

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

2 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person Ms. Maxwell	Juror defendant	5	1	View
person Ms. Maxwell	Defendant juror	5	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	Court scheduling discussion	Discussion regarding the court schedule, including jury presence, potential extended hours on Mon...	Courtroom (implied)	View
N/A	Jury deliberation	The document provides instructions for the jury on how to deliberate on the six separate counts a...	Courtroom (implied)	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE regarding financial exhibits.	Southern District of New Yo...	View
2022-08-10	Legal proceeding	Summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.	Courtroom (implied)	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Opening Statement in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN	Courtroom (Southern District)	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	A summation (closing argument) was delivered by Ms. Menninger to a jury regarding the government'...	Courtroom (implied)	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court Summation	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court Summations	Courtroom (Case 1:20-cr-003...	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Defense Summation by Ms. Menninger	Courtroom (Southern Distric...	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Filing of court transcript containing jury charge.	Court	View
2021-12-18	N/A	Filing of jury instructions or trial transcript regarding Count Five (Conspiracy) and Count Six.	Southern District of New Yo...	View
2021-12-17	N/A	Filing of Jury Instruction No. 8 regarding Reasonable Doubt in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.	Court (implied)	View

DOJ-OGR-00008630.jpg

This document is page 92 of a court filing (Document 563) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. The text contains standard jury instructions where the judge clarifies that their comments or questions should not be interpreted as an opinion on witness credibility or the evidence, emphasizing that the verdict is solely the jury's role.

Court filing / jury instructions (transcript)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

As Recipient

Total

Request for transcripts and schedule clarification

From: jury (implied)

To: THE COURT

A note from the jury requesting transcripts for five individuals (Shawn, Cimberly Espinosa, an unreadable name, Amanda Young, and Jason Richards) and asking for clarification on the deliberation schedule around the dates 12/31 and 1/1.

Note

N/A

Communication Source

Transportation / Instruction

From: jury (implied)

To: THE COURT

A note from the jury regarding transportation, which the defense finds clear but the court finds confusing.

Note

N/A

Communication Source

Question about considering testimony

From: jury (implied)

To: THE COURT

A note from the jury to the judge, which prompts the discussion. The Court asks for the note back and begins to read the question from it: "Can we consider Annie's testimony as..."

Note

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Request for transcript

From: jury (implied)

To: THE COURT

The court received a note, identified as Court Exhibit 20, from the jury requesting the transcript of Larry Visoski.

Note

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Credibility of witnesses

From: MS. MENNINGER

To: jury (implied)

Ms. Menninger argues that the jury should doubt the testimony of witnesses like Carolyn and Jane because their stories have changed, they may be motivated by money, and their claims are contradicted by other witnesses like Eva and Michelle.

Courtroom summation

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Request for transcripts and clarification on deliberation...

From: jury (implied)

To: THE COURT

The jury sent a note to the court requesting transcripts for five witnesses (Shawn, Cimberly Espinosa, an unnamed person, Amanda Young, and Jason Richards) and asked if they were required to deliberate every day, including 12/31 and 1/1, until a verdict is reached.

Note

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell

From: Ms. Moe

To: jury (implied)

Ms. Moe argues that the case is about manipulation, money, and memory, reframing the defense's points to argue that Maxwell and Epstein manipulated and exploited young girls from struggling families using their wealth, and that the victims' traumatic memories are central to the case.

Summation

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Evidence Request

From: jury (implied)

To: THE COURT

"May we please have the Larry Visoski transcript."

Note

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Court Exhibit 9

From: jury (implied)

To: THE COURT

Can we consider Annie's testimony as conspiracy to commit a crime in Counts One and Three?

Jury note

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Clarification on Exhibit 3505-005

From: THE COURT

To: jury (implied)

3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit. The testimony regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding Carolyn's testimony.

Note

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell

From: MS. MENNINGER

To: jury (implied)

Ms. Menninger argues against the credibility of witness memories, contrasts expert witnesses Dr. Loftus and Dr. Rocchio, and outlines the conspiracy charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, urging the jury towards acquittal.

Court summation

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Jury request or question during deliberations

From: jury (implied)

To: THE COURT

The Court acknowledges receiving a note from the jury and discusses the response with counsel, referring them to instruction number 21.

Note

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search