📧 Communication
Court TestimonyCommunication Details
An attorney cross-examines witness Schoeman about whether having more information (specifically, that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney) would have helped his analysis. Schoeman is noncommittal but agrees that having matching names and middle initials makes it statistically likely two records refer to the same person.
📄 Source Document
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Schoeman. An attorney questions Schoeman on whether his analysis regarding Juror No. 1 would have been improved by knowing the juror was a suspended attorney. Schoeman defends his conclusion based on the information he had, but concedes that matching names and middle initials make it statistically likely two records refer to the same person.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication