Unnamed questioner (attorney)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding testimony on childhood abuse reporting rates, spec... | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | A witness named Loftus is being questioned about their professional qualifications and the basis ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | Cross-examination of witness Mr. McHugh regarding Government Exhibits 502 (checks) and 506 (a sig... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding their visit to the property later known as Zorro... | Court or deposition setting | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of Mr. Schoeman regarding his knowledge of information connecting Juror No. 1, ... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Court hearing | Direct examination of Conrad regarding his deliberate decision to lie during jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
Limitations of video and photographic evidence
A questioner cross-examines a witness, Parkinson, to establish that video and photographic evidence from October 20, 2005, only shows the state of a house and its contents on that specific day and cannot be used to determine what was present on any prior date. The witness agrees with this assessment.
Limitations of video and photographic evidence
A questioner cross-examines a witness, Parkinson, to establish that video and photographic evidence from October 20, 2005, only shows the state of a house and its contents on that specific day and cannot be used to determine what was present on any prior date. The witness agrees with this assessment.
First visit to Jeffrey Epstein's house
An attorney questions Carolyn about her first visit to Jeffrey Epstein's house when she was 14. She recounts being told she would give a massage to a wealthy friend to make money, being driven there by Virginia, and her initial impression of the house.
Cross-examination regarding an unnamed woman's activities
An attorney questions the witness, Visoski, about an unnamed woman's role in purchasing items, outfitting airplanes, and managing large properties, including a 10,000-acre ranch.
Cross-examination of Parkinson regarding a visit to Mr. E...
A transcript of a cross-examination where a witness, Mr. Parkinson, is questioned about his presence at a residence on October 5, 2003, his interaction with Mr. Epstein, and whether he saw Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning is interrupted by an objection from MS. COMEY which is sustained by the court.
Aircraft ownership through corporate entities for liabili...
An attorney questions the witness, Rodgers, to establish that it is common practice to purchase and own aircraft through separate companies to limit the owner's personal liability in case of an accident.
Witness's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine...
An attorney cross-examines a witness named Rodgers about Jeffrey Epstein paying for his daughter's tuition and his long-standing, comfortable relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell.
Procedures for identifying flight passengers
A cross-examination where the witness, Rodgers, confirms they were not always given the full names of all passengers, that passenger names were not critical information, and that no airline regulation required them to gather the names.
Photographs of a house and the timing of a search
This is a transcript of a cross-examination where an unnamed questioner asks the witness, Maguire, about whether photographs accurately represent a house's interior during the 1990s-2000s and at the time of a search in 2019. The start time of the search is also clarified.
Recollection of flights to Interlochen
An attorney questions the witness, Rodgers, about their memory of specific flights. The attorney establishes that Rodgers' confidence in the details of the flights comes from reviewing flight records and a logbook, not from an independent memory of each flight.
Cross-examination regarding an analysis of a juror's iden...
An attorney cross-examines witness Schoeman about whether having more information (specifically, that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney) would have helped his analysis. Schoeman is noncommittal but agrees that having matching names and middle initials makes it statistically likely two records refer to the same person.
Concealment of legal education during jury selection (voi...
An attorney questions a juror named Conrad, who admits to deliberately lying to the court about his legal background (having a JD) in order to be selected for a jury. Conrad explains he did this because he believed anyone with legal experience would be dismissed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity