📧 Communication
emailCommunication Details
Suggests adding specific language to a letter regarding checking IDs and emphasizes that the defendant's and Epstein's interactions with Minor Victim-3 were part of a broader scheme to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts, and that a conspiracy does not require the completion of the substantive crime, citing Salinas, 522 U.S. at 65.
📄 Source Document
This document is an email chain from November 7, 2021, discussing legal strategy related to a 'Decision on motion to strike' in an Epstein-related case. The emails focus on the legal interpretation of conspiracy and the transportation of Minor Victim-3, asserting that a conspiracy does not require the completion of a substantive crime. It also references Judge Nathan's decision denying pretrial motions and mentions the involvement of an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication