EFTA00022177.pdf
67 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
67 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from November 7, 2021, discussing legal strategy related to a 'Decision on motion to strike' in an Epstein-related case. The emails focus on the legal interpretation of conspiracy and the transportation of Minor Victim-3, asserting that a conspiracy does not require the completion of a substantive crime. It also references Judge Nathan's decision denying pretrial motions and mentions the involvement of an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Issued first decision denying pretrial motions
|
| Minor Victim-3 | Victim |
Referred to as 'MV-3' and a minor victim in Epstein-related discussions
|
| Assistant United States Attorney |
Sender/recipient of emails, located at Southern District of New York
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York |
Location of the Assistant United States Attorney
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-11-07
Discussion and drafting of legal arguments regarding a motion to strike, specifically concerning the legal interpretation of conspiracy and the transportation of Minor Victim-3 in relation to Jeffrey Epstein.
Judge Nathan's first decision denying pretrial motions, with a discussion of MV-3 starting on page 26.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the Assistant United States Attorney
|
Relationships (1)
Epstein's interactions with Minor Victim-3 were part of a broader scheme and agreement to entice and transport minor victims with intent to commit illegal sex acts.
Key Quotes (2)
"First, as the Indictment itself makes clear, the defendant's and Epstein's interactions with Minor Victim-3 were part of a broader scheme and agreement to entice and transport minor victims with intent to commit illegal sex acts. Even if Minor Victim-3 was not ultimately transported as a minor, the core of a conspiracy is an agreement to engage in criminal conduct; there is no legal requirement that the agreed upon crime be completed."Source
EFTA00022177.pdf
Quote #1
"Because a conspiracy does not require the completion of a substantive crime, it does not matter whether Minor Victim-3 was ever in fact transported as a minor, or whether the elements of the substantive crimes of transportation an enticement are satisfied as to her. See Salinas, 522 U.S. at 65."Source
EFTA00022177.pdf
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,776 characters)
From:
To:
Subject: RE: Decision on motion to strike
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:12:38 +0000
To:
Subject: RE: Decision on motion to strike
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:12:38 +0000
Will do!
From:
Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 10:06 AM
To:
Subject: RE: Decision on motion to strike
Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 10:06 AM
To:
Subject: RE: Decision on motion to strike
Let's put this language in our letter! Maybe in the paragraph I added at the end about checking ID's at the door? I think
this is an important point.
this is an important point.
First, as the Indictment itself makes clear, the defendant's and Epstein's interactions with Minor Victim-3 were part
of a broader scheme and agreement to entice and transport minor victims with intent to commit illegal sex acts.
Even if Minor Victim-3 was not ultimately transported as a minor, the core of a conspiracy is an agreement to
engage in criminal conduct; there is no legal requirement that the agreed upon crime be completed.
of a broader scheme and agreement to entice and transport minor victims with intent to commit illegal sex acts.
Even if Minor Victim-3 was not ultimately transported as a minor, the core of a conspiracy is an agreement to
engage in criminal conduct; there is no legal requirement that the agreed upon crime be completed.
Because a conspiracy does not require the completion of a substantive crime, it does not matter whether Minor
Victim-3 was ever in fact transported as a minor, or whether the elements of the substantive crimes of
transportation an enticement are satisfied as to her. See Salinas, 522 U.S. at 65.
Victim-3 was ever in fact transported as a minor, or whether the elements of the substantive crimes of
transportation an enticement are satisfied as to her. See Salinas, 522 U.S. at 65.
From:
Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 10:00 AM
To:
Subject: RE: Decision on motion to strike
Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 10:00 AM
To:
Subject: RE: Decision on motion to strike
Sure thing. The discussion starts on page 184 of the PDF (157 of the pagination).
From:
Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 9:58 AM
To:
Subject: RE: Decision on motion to strike
Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 9:58 AM
To:
Subject: RE: Decision on motion to strike
thanks, would you mind also sending me our brief on this?
From:
Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 9:49 AM
To:
Subject: Decision on motion to strike
Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 9:49 AM
To:
Subject: Decision on motion to strike
Hey
Attached is Judge Nathan's first decision denying the pretrial motions. The (very brief) discussion of MV-3 starts on page
26.
26.
Thanks,
EFTA00022177
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
1 Saint Andrews Plaza
New York, New York 10007
Southern District of New York
1 Saint Andrews Plaza
New York, New York 10007
EFTA00022178
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document