📧 Communication

conversation

Communication Details

From
To
Schoeman Schoeman
Subject
Identity of Juror No. 1 / Ms. Conrad
Message Content

Trzaskoma mentioned a disbarred lawyer had the same name as Juror No. 1/Ms. Conrad, but concluded it was not the same person because the juror's voir dire did not indicate law school education.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00010101.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This is a page from a court transcript concerning the direct examination of a witness named Schoeman. The testimony details a conversation between Schoeman and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding 'Juror No. 1' (Ms. Conrad). They discussed whether the juror might be a disbarred lawyer with the same name, but concluded she was not based on her educational background revealed during voir dire.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication