DOJ-OGR-00010101.jpg
449 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
449 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript concerning the direct examination of a witness named Schoeman. The testimony details a conversation between Schoeman and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding 'Juror No. 1' (Ms. Conrad). They discussed whether the juror might be a disbarred lawyer with the same name, but concluded she was not based on her educational background revealed during voir dire.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Schoeman | Witness |
Under direct examination ('Schoeman - direct').
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma | Attorney/Associate |
Person the witness (Schoeman) had a conversation with regarding Juror No. 1.
|
| Ms. Conrad | Juror No. 1 |
The juror being discussed; there was concern she might share a name with a disbarred lawyer.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Identified as Ms. Conrad.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune firm |
Law firm mentioned in question regarding discussions about Juror No. 1.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR bates stamp).
|
Timeline (1 events)
Unknown (prior to testimony)
Conversation between Schoeman and Ms. Trzaskoma while walking across Foley Square.
Foley Square towards Duane Street
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Schoeman and Trzaskoma were walking during their conversation.
|
|
|
Street Schoeman and Trzaskoma were walking towards.
|
Relationships (2)
They were walking together across Foley Square discussing case details (Juror No. 1).
Referred to as 'Ms. Conrad, Juror No. 1'.
Key Quotes (2)
"She told me that there was a person with the same name as -- I don't recall whether she said Juror No. 1 or Ms. Conrad, but a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer but that it was not the same person as Juror No. 1."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010101.jpg
Quote #1
"She anticipated that question as I was speaking it and said something to the effect that her educational background did not include law school."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010101.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,488 characters)
Case 2:20-cr-00118-PAE Document 646-30 Filed 08/12/22 Page 3 of 17
A-5818
A-5818
361
C2grdau4 Schoeman - direct
1 Q. Sometime after the reading of the note from Juror No. 1,
2 did you speak to Ms. Trzaskoma about Ms. Conrad, Juror No. 1?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Would you tell the Court what was said between you and Ms.
5 Trzaskoma at that time.
6 A. Yes. I recall that we had a conversation. I believe it
7 was as we were walking across Foley Square towards Duane
8 Street. She told me that there was a person with the same name
9 as -- I don't recall whether she said Juror No. 1 or Ms.
10 Conrad, but a person with the same name who was a disbarred
11 lawyer but that it was not the same person as Juror No. 1.
12 I began formulating a question to say, how do you
13 know? She anticipated that question and said, because of the
14 voir dire. I began formulating the question of, what question
15 during the voir dire would have disclosed that? She
16 anticipated that question as I was speaking it and said
17 something to the effect that her educational background did not
18 include law school. I said, then it's not the same person?
19 And she said right. By that time we had finished crossing the
20 street.
21 Q. Any further discussion about Juror No. 1?
22 A. Not with Ms. Trzaskoma during that time period.
23 Q. Any further discussion with anyone at the Brune firm
24 regarding Juror No. 1 during that time period?
25 A. No.
C2grdau4 Schoeman - direct
1 Q. Sometime after the reading of the note from Juror No. 1,
2 did you speak to Ms. Trzaskoma about Ms. Conrad, Juror No. 1?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Would you tell the Court what was said between you and Ms.
5 Trzaskoma at that time.
6 A. Yes. I recall that we had a conversation. I believe it
7 was as we were walking across Foley Square towards Duane
8 Street. She told me that there was a person with the same name
9 as -- I don't recall whether she said Juror No. 1 or Ms.
10 Conrad, but a person with the same name who was a disbarred
11 lawyer but that it was not the same person as Juror No. 1.
12 I began formulating a question to say, how do you
13 know? She anticipated that question and said, because of the
14 voir dire. I began formulating the question of, what question
15 during the voir dire would have disclosed that? She
16 anticipated that question as I was speaking it and said
17 something to the effect that her educational background did not
18 include law school. I said, then it's not the same person?
19 And she said right. By that time we had finished crossing the
20 street.
21 Q. Any further discussion about Juror No. 1?
22 A. Not with Ms. Trzaskoma during that time period.
23 Q. Any further discussion with anyone at the Brune firm
24 regarding Juror No. 1 during that time period?
25 A. No.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010101
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010101
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document