📧 Communication

Public Comment

Communication Details

From
Three Georgetown University law students Linked to Three Georgetown University law students
To
National Labor Relations Board National Labor Relations Board
Subject
Opposition to imputing knowledge to union-represented employees
Message Content

Submitted comments opposing the idea that union-represented employees should be deemed to have constructive knowledge of NLRA rights, arguing it would create a disincentive for employers to post notices.

📄 Source Document

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022306.jpg
ESTATE Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document from the Federal Register discusses the implications of an employer's failure to post required notices under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It addresses the tolling of the statute of limitations for filing unfair labor practice charges, particularly debating whether union-represented employees should be treated differently from non-union employees. The text also considers whether a failure to post can be used as evidence of an employer's unlawful antiunion motive.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication