| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
U.S. Supreme Court
|
Authority affirmed |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
|
Opposed rule aspect |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Tom Harkin
|
Supportive in context of rulemaking |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
George Miller
|
Supportive in context of rulemaking |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Lester A. Heltzer
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Employers
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
American Trucking Association
|
Adversarial in context of rulemaking |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Heritage Foundation
|
Adversarial in context of rulemaking |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
employer
|
Regulatory |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
CIA
|
Adversarial in context of rulemaking |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Various employers, unions, and interest groups
|
Regulatory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Public/Stakeholders
|
Rulemaking process |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Center on National Labor Policy, Inc.
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) promulgated a rule requiring employers to post a notice... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the legal principle of 'equitable tolling' for the statute of limitations under NLR... | N/A | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of a final rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in the Federal Register.... | United States | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of the 'Final Rule' for 29 CFR Part 104 in the Federal Register. | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of 'Rules and Regulations' in the Federal Register, containing a legal analysis/disse... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of a final rule in the Federal Register requiring employers subject to the NLRA to po... | United States | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board published its final rule on employer requirements for posting ... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final 'Rules and Regulations' in the Fede... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final rule and accompanying explanation i... | Washington, D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of 'Rules and Regulations' by the National Labor Relations Board in the Federal Regis... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of the Final Rule for 29 CFR Part 104, 'Notification of Employee Rights; Obligations ... | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The NLRB published its final rule in the Federal Register, requiring employers to post notices of... | United States | View |
| 2011-03-23 | N/A | The NLRB's final cutoff date for accepting public comments on the proposed rule. | United States | View |
| 2011-02-22 | N/A | Original deadline for the public to submit comments on the NLRB's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in American Hospital Association v. NLRB, which unanimously upheld an NLRB... | United States | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case American Hospital Association v. NLRB (AHA) is cited, where the court upheld t... | United States | View |
| 1974-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Bell Aerospace, which emphasized the existence of the Board's l... | United States | View |
| 1969-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon Co., which emphasized the existence of the Board's... | United States | View |
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | National Labor Re... | Employers | $0.00 | The required notices for employees would be mad... | View |
The Board's website, http://www.nlrb.gov, is provided as a source for downloading official posters and finding contact information for regional offices.
Submitted a comment with concerns that the rule could subject employers to charges for conduct as far back as 1935.
A proposal by the California Chamber and NCAE suggests the Board should send at least two mailed letters requesting an employer post the required notice within a specified time, preferably 30 days.
Submitted comments asserting that the burden to ensure members are aware of their rights should be placed equally on unions.
Submitted comments opposing the idea that union-represented employees should be deemed to have constructive knowledge of NLRA rights, arguing it would create a disincentive for employers to post notices.
Submitted comments arguing against tolling the 10(b) period because 'ignorance of the law is no excuse.'
A more complete discussion of the Board’s jurisdictional standards can be found at http://www.nlrb.gov.
Submitted comments answering in the affirmative to the question of whether unions filing charges should be deemed to have constructive knowledge of the unlawful conduct.
The Board's website, http://www.nlrb.gov, is provided as a source for downloading official posters and finding contact information for regional offices.
A more complete discussion of the Board’s jurisdictional standards can be found at http://www.nlrb.gov.
A proposal by the California Chamber and NCAE suggests the Board should send at least two mailed letters requesting an employer post the required notice within a specified time, preferably 30 days.
A proposal by the California Chamber and NCAE suggests the Board should send at least two mailed letters requesting an employer post the required notice within a specified time, preferably 30 days.
Submitted comments urging that an employee represented by a union should be treated similarly to one represented by an attorney regarding imputed knowledge of filing deadlines.
Submitted comments expressing concern that the statute of limitations for unfair labor practices could be tolled 'perhaps indefinitely'.
Argued that the Board's reliance on general Section 6 authority is insufficient to meet the Administrative Procedure Act's requirements.
Proposed a 5 percent standard for the 'significant' threshold for translated notices.
Objected that the rule could require them to use all of their various communication technologies to convey the notice.
Asserted that the Board cannot properly consider an employer's knowing failure to post as evidence of unlawful motive.
Suggested the rule on electronic posting would 'chill' employers' use of new technologies.
Proposed that the 'significant' threshold for translated notices be 40 percent of the production and maintenance workforce.
Opposed deeming union-represented employees to have constructive knowledge, as it would create a disincentive for employers to post required notices.
Argued that employees represented by a union should be treated similarly to those represented by an attorney regarding knowledge of filing time limits.
Proposed a 5 percent standard for the 'significant' threshold for translated notices.
Argued that unions filing charges should be deemed to have constructive knowledge of the unlawful conduct.
Argued against tolling based on the maxim 'ignorance of the law is no excuse'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity