📧 Communication
lettersCommunication Details
From
The parties (Defense and Government)
Linked to the parties (defense and government)
To
The Court/Judge
The Court/Judge
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Legal arguments regarding extrinsic evidence
Message Content
The parties agree regarding the inappropriateness of extrinsic evidence if a witness admits to making a statement.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00016751.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text records a judge providing legal guidance regarding the admissibility of prior inconsistent statements and extrinsic evidence under Rule 613(b). The judge cites specific case law (Almonte, Leonardi) to explain that law enforcement notes generally do not prove inconsistency unless the witness subscribed to them or the interviewing officer is called as a witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication