The Court/Judge
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jury
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Jury instruction | Instruction No. 35 was provided to a jury, outlining the legal standard for the second element of... | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Filing of Jury Instructions (Document 562) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017644.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness identified as 'Jane' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning, likely led by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, focuses on an application (Exhibit J-5) Jane submitted to the Interlochen Arts Camp. Specifically, the defense establishes that Jane checked 'no' on the application regarding whether she was applying for financial aid or expecting any outside funds, scholarships, or grants for her attendance.
DOJ-OGR-00014759.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022, in which the judge overrules objections from the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The court finds by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant personally recruited Virginia (Giuffre) while she was a minor to provide sexualized massages to Epstein, was aware of the sexual nature of these acts, and used monetary incentives to encourage Virginia to recruit another minor, Carolyn. The judge cites testimony from witnesses Annie, Jane, Kate, and Mr. Alessi, as well as flight records.
DOJ-OGR-00016241.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. The witness testifies about visiting her sister, Maria, who was working for Jeffrey Epstein in New York in December 1995. The witness notes that she could not afford the travel herself and that Jeffrey Epstein purchased the plane ticket for her.
DOJ-OGR-00021556.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) detailing a judge's rulings on objections to a Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) regarding a defendant (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The text discusses the defendant's role in grooming victims 'Jane' and 'Kate' for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically overruling an objection to exclude Kate's testimony about the defendant's recruitment methods. It also addresses a dispute regarding evidence of Epstein paying for a trip to Thailand for an individual named 'Annie'.
DOJ-OGR-00013346.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of Mrs. Hesse) filed on August 10, 2022. Mrs. Hesse testifies that part of her regular job function at the Epstein and Maxwell residence was to immediately record phone messages in books, establishing these logs as business records. Following her testimony, Government attorney Ms. Moe moves to admit several exhibits (Series 1 and 3), some publicly and others under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00014627.jpg
This document is page 227 of the jury instructions (Charge) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on August 10, 2022. The text outlines legal standards for considering co-conspirator statements made in the defendant's absence and introduces Instruction No. 39 regarding 'Conscious Avoidance.' The judge explains that the jury may consider whether the defendant 'deliberately closed her eyes to what otherwise would have been obvious' when determining if she acted knowingly.
Sentencing memorandum for Tiffany Days
An 'eloquent memorandum' submitted by Mr. Donaldson, presumably on behalf of the defendant, Ms. Days.
Sentencing submission
A set of letters describing Ms. Maxwell as attentive, loving to her family, and a loyal and generous friend.
Sentencing submission
A report discussing the impacts on Ms. Maxwell of her 'overbearing and demanding father' and the 'tragic death of her brother'.
Sentencing submission
A letter describing Ms. Maxwell's tutoring of other inmates while incarcerated.
Sentencing submission
A set of letters describing Ms. Maxwell as attentive, loving to her family, and a loyal and generous friend.
Sentencing submission
A report discussing the impacts on Ms. Maxwell of her 'overbearing and demanding father' and the 'tragic death of her brother'.
Sentencing submission
A letter describing Ms. Maxwell's tutoring of other inmates while incarcerated.
Factual assertions in a case involving Mr. Parse
A brief filed under Brune's signature which she now regrets because the facts were not accurate/complete.
Count Four and 'motivating factor'
The jury asked a question regarding Count Four, which the judge found difficult to parse but related to the concept of a 'motivating factor'.
Response to jury question
The defense made a suggestion on how to answer the jury's question, proposing to either point to the 'motivating factor' language or simply say 'no'. The judge rejected this proposal.
Jury Question regarding Count Four
Argument regarding how to answer a jury question about whether a return flight alone can sustain a conviction.
Legal arguments regarding extrinsic evidence
The parties agree regarding the inappropriateness of extrinsic evidence if a witness admits to making a statement.
Bail Conditions and Flight Risk
Argument regarding bail conditions, safety assurances, and rebuttal of flight risk allegations.
Bail Application/Release Conditions
Argument for release on strict conditions and rebuttal of flight risk allegations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity