📧 Communication
courtroom dialogueCommunication Details
From
MS. MOE
Linked to Ms. Moe
To
Your Honor
your Honor
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Ambiguity of evidence regarding flights
Message Content
MS. MOE responds to the previous speaker, stating that a note being discussed is unclear about which flight it refers to (a return flight vs. a flight to New Mexico), making it difficult to determine intent.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the purpose of travel undertaken by a person named Jane. An unnamed speaker argues that Jane's return trip from New Mexico was not for illicit sexual activity because Mr. Epstein was not present, while another speaker, Ms. Moe, counters that the evidence is ambiguous as to which flight is being discussed. The conversation centers on interpreting Jane's intent and whether her travel meets the elements of a crime.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication