A deliberating jury sent a note to the court with a question. The Defendant proposed several responses, including a simple 'no' and later a supplemental instruction, which the court found erroneous or problematic.
This legal document, filed on April 29, 2022, details a dispute during a trial over how to respond to a note from a deliberating jury. The Defendant proposed several responses, which the Court deemed legally erroneous, including a simple 'no' and later a request to direct the jury to specific lines of an instruction. The core issue revolves around the Defendant's argument concerning the purpose of a return flight in relation to illegal activity and the Court's discretion in guiding the jury.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication