["Court"]
PersonRelationship Network
Count Four
The jury sent a note asking only about Count Four, to which the defendant's proposed instruction was partly unresponsive.
Reply brief
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Juror Qualification Questionnaire
Juror 50 completed a questionnaire, providing answers to questions (specifically 25 and 48) that are now being challenged as false and not credible.
Explanation of questionnaire answers
Juror 50 testified to explain his answers, stating he was rushed and that he no longer considers himself a victim of a crime as part of his healing process.
Defendant's requests regarding housing and discovery access
A 'Defense Letter' is mentioned, which contained the defendant's requests that this document is responding to.
Renewed Bail Motion
A motion filed by the defense which included letters and documentation to argue for the defendant's release on bail.
Investigation details
The Government informed the Court that it had contacted Boies Schiller as part of its search for potential victims.
U-Visa
During cross-examination, Kate denied wanting a U-Visa or beginning the process of obtaining one.
U-Visa
During cross-examination, Kate denied wanting a U-Visa or beginning the process of obtaining one.
Basis for conviction
A note from the jury which the Defendant contends revealed that the jury convicted her for intending that Jane engage in sexual activity in New Mexico, not New York.
Request for modification of protective order
The Defendant filed a request seeking modification of the protective order to use documents produced in the criminal case for other purposes.
An ambiguous question requiring clarification
A deliberating jury sent a note to the court with a question. The Defendant proposed several responses, including a simple 'no' and later a supplemental instruction, which the court found erroneous or problematic.
respondeat superior and vicarious liability
A juror sent a note to the court that included the legal terms 'respondeat superior' and 'vicarious liability'.
respondeat superior and vicarious liability
A juror sent a note to the court that included the legal terms 'respondeat superior' and 'vicarious liability'.
Legal arguments in the case
The defendant's briefing referenced the letter from Catherine Conrad.
Legal arguments in the case
Mr. Shechtman's brief is mentioned as having omitted the fact that the jury's struggle with legal definitions ended after they asked the Court to reread them.
Jury communications
Instruction No. 59 addresses the topic of communications between the jury and the court.
Jury communications
Instruction No. 59 addresses the topic of communications between the jury and the court.
Question regarding the basis for conviction on Count Four
The jury sent a note with a question regarding whether arranging a return flight was sufficient to convict on the substantive transportation count (Count Four).
Experience at a ranch with Epstein and Maxwell
A witness, A. Farmer, answers questions about a weekend spent at a ranch. She describes seeing staff, being alone with Epstein and Maxwell, her mixed feelings about the situation as a teenager, and her positive initial impression of Maxwell.
Cross-examination regarding a trip to New Mexico
A witness named Jane is cross-examined about a trip to a ranch in New Mexico, her memory of the property, and who accompanied her.
Cross-examination regarding instructions to lie about age...
Carolyn is being cross-examined about being told by Ms. Roberts and Virginia to say she was 17 to Epstein, and about her first visit to Epstein's house.
Request to preclude co-conspirator statements
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell requests the Court to enter an order precluding the government from introducing alleged co-conspirator statements due to non-compliance with the Court's September 3, 2021 order.
Bail hearing arguments
The defense made written and oral submissions to the Court urging the release of the defendant on bail.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity