The Defendant contends that a jury note received during deliberations revealed that the jury convicted her on a crime different from the one charged, specifically regarding the location of the intended sexual activity.
This legal document is a court filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated April 29, 2022. It addresses the Defendant's argument that her conviction was based on a 'constructive amendment' to the indictment, because a jury note suggested they found her guilty of intending a crime in New Mexico, rather than New York as charged. The court refutes this claim, concluding there is no 'substantial likelihood' that the Defendant was convicted of an offense different from the one in the indictment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication