The jury sent a note with a question regarding whether arranging a return flight was sufficient to convict on the substantive transportation count (Count Four).
This legal document argues that Maxwell's conviction on Count Four (substantive transportation) was likely improper. The argument posits that the jury convicted her based on arranging a return flight for 'Jane' from New Mexico after the alleged sexual abuse had already occurred, and the Court's refusal to provide a clarifying instruction allowed this. This potential error also casts doubt on the validity of the conviction for a related conspiracy charge, Count Three.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication