A dialogue in court where attorneys debate the significance of a financial transaction (a helicopter purchase) and other associations (Larry Visoski holding assets for Epstein) as evidence of a defendant's continued involvement in a conspiracy.
This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, capturing a legal argument about evidence. A defense attorney argues that a helicopter purchase and testimony from Larry Visoski about holding assets for Mr. Epstein are not proof of their client's continued involvement in a conspiracy. In response, prosecutor Ms. Moe contends that this financial evidence was specifically offered to prove the defendant remained a 'close associate' of Epstein for many years, contradicting the defense's claim that she had 'moved on'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication