THE COURT, MR. EVERDELL, MS. MOE
PersonRelationship Network
Sentencing guideline calculations and objections
A dialogue during a court proceeding where the judge confirms a sentencing guideline calculation (offense level 36, range 188-235 months), and an attorney, Mr. Everdell, preserves an objection to grouping Virginia and Melissa as separate offenses.
Status of a bequest from an estate in bankruptcy
A discussion about whether a bequest, listed as an asset on a financial affidavit, should be considered for the purpose of fines. Mr. Everdell argues it should not be, due to the estate's bankruptcy, other claims against it, and the likelihood the bequest will be contested.
Applicability of the 2004 Manual and the timeline of an o...
A dialogue during a court proceeding where Ms. Moe argues for the government that an offense continued past November 1, 2004, based on trial testimony. The Court reframes the key question to whether conspiratorial conduct can be proven to have occurred within the specific window of November and December 2004.
Admissibility and interpretation of evidence regarding a ...
A dialogue in court where attorneys debate the significance of a financial transaction (a helicopter purchase) and other associations (Larry Visoski holding assets for Epstein) as evidence of a defendant's continued involvement in a conspiracy.
Applicability of the 2004 sentencing manual
A transcribed discussion between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Moe and Mr. Everdell, about whether a criminal offense continued into a specific two-month window in 2004. The government, represented by Ms. Moe, argues that it did, based on victim testimony, which would make the 2004 Manual applicable.
Admissibility of evidence regarding Ms. Maxwell's residence
Mr. Everdell argues for admitting land registry records for two properties to challenge testimony about where Ms. Maxwell lived in '92-'93. The Court mediates the discussion, and Mr. Everdell suggests that if the records are admitted, the prosecution should be allowed to admit deposition testimony from Ms. Maxwell.
Anonymous protection for witnesses testifying on behalf o...
A discussion in court where Mr. Everdell requests anonymous protection for witnesses testifying for Ms. Maxwell. The Court instructs the parties to confer and present their arguments. Ms. Moe indicates this is new information and requests time to confer with the defense and prepare a briefing.
Response to a jury question regarding jury instructions
A discussion between the judge and two attorneys about how to properly respond to a jury's question. Mr. Everdell suggests referring the jury to a specific instruction, but Ms. Moe disagrees, believing it doesn't address the jury's actual query about Count Four.
Discussion on Factual Objections and Sentencing Guideline...
A court discussion regarding factual objections, the adoption of PSR recitations, and the process for calculating sentencing guidelines, including the defense's proposed imprisonment range.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity