📧 Communication

brief

Communication Details

From
To
["Court"] ["Court"]
Subject
Legal arguments in the case
Message Content

The defendant's briefing referenced the letter from Catherine Conrad.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00010180.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a court transcript where an attorney, Ms. Davis, argues against a motion for a new trial. She references a letter from Catherine Conrad about jury deliberations concerning David Parse, noting the jury struggled with the legal definitions of 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' but ultimately made a deliberate and informed decision, as evidenced by their verdict on conspiracy and tax evasion counts. The discussion highlights the legal nuances that influenced the jury's split verdict.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication