Mr. Cohen makes final arguments to the court, distinguishing the current case from U.S. v. Epstein. He argues that the Epstein case was about 'dangerousness,' a factor the government is not pursuing in the current matter.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, makes his final points to the judge, arguing against the government's reliance on the 'U.S. v. Epstein' case. Cohen contends that the Epstein case was primarily about 'dangerousness,' a legal issue not being pursued by the government in the current matter, making the precedent inapplicable.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication