Mr. Cohen
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client/Witness
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the Judge
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Client
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Conference panelist |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attendees of 2016 Future of Financials Conference
|
Speaker panelist |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court hearing | Ms. Moe presents the government's case, asserting that the facts of the defendant's conduct, incl... | this court | View |
| N/A | Court hearing/litigation | A lawyer is presenting arguments to a judge regarding a client's case, discussing past conduct (1... | Court (implied by 'THE COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A discussion between Mr. Cohen and the Court regarding the relevance of precedent cases to the cu... | a courthouse | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court proceeding | A court hearing where attorney Mr. Cohen argues for his client's release on bail before a judge. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court hearing | A court hearing where an unidentified speaker (likely for the government) and Mr. Cohen make argu... | Unspecified Court | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court proceeding | A court hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) where the judge checks the audio/visual technology with ... | Courtroom (implied, via tel... | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion in court regarding a client's detention conditions, financial issues, and the court'... | Court (implied) | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court hearing | A court hearing where the judge excluded time and set a firm trial date for July 12, 2021. The ju... | N/A | View |
| 2016-11-17 | N/A | Bank of America Merrill Lynch's '2016 Future of Financials Conference'. | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001899.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 10, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The judge rules to set a firm trial date for July 12, 2021, justifying the delay as necessary for discovery and preparation, and finding it serves the ends of justice. The court then prepares to hear arguments regarding the government's motion for the defendant's detention.
DOJ-OGR-00001880.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, for case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The judge begins by confirming that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, and counsel, Mr. Cohen, have a working audio connection. Another individual, Ms. Moe, interrupts to report that the public call-in line is full and proposes an alternative for her colleagues to listen, which the court questions due to concerns about speakerphone feedback.
DOJ-OGR-00001075.jpg
This document is a partial court transcript from April 1, 2021, where Ms. Moe, representing the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, addresses the court. She asserts that the government's presentation of the defendant's conduct, detailed in an indictment returned by a grand jury, consists of undisputed facts and evidence, not 'spin.' Ms. Moe highlights the chilling conduct described in the indictment, involving an adult woman cultivating underage girls for sexual abuse and exploitation by an adult man, and also mentions the defendant's undisputed actions of living in hiding and financial matters.
DOJ-OGR-00001052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, is arguing a point by citing past high-profile cases like Madoff, Dreier, and Esposito. The judge interrupts to question the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections, which distinguishes them from the current case. Mr. Cohen admits they did not, highlighting that the current defendant's foreign ties are a key point of contention.
DOJ-OGR-00001954.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, makes his final points to the judge, arguing against the government's reliance on the 'U.S. v. Epstein' case. Cohen contends that the Epstein case was primarily about 'dangerousness,' a legal issue not being pursued by the government in the current matter, making the precedent inapplicable.
DOJ-OGR-00001943.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, detailing a discussion between attorney Mr. Cohen and The Court. Mr. Cohen describes the severe, solitary confinement-like conditions his client endured at the MDC, including denial of basic rights and access to legal counsel, and requests more time to address the court's concerns regarding financial matters. The Court seeks clarification on the nature of the client's detention, specifically if there was consent.
DOJ-OGR-00001942.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding, dated December 10, 2020, where a lawyer is arguing before a judge ('your Honor') regarding a client who has been in custody. The arguments involve the application of legal factors (3142 factors), guidance from the Second Circuit and Supreme Court, and the historical context of the alleged conduct. The judge ('THE COURT') interrupts Mr. Cohen to ask for clarification on a point.
DOJ-OGR-00001919.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on December 10, 2020. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, is arguing for his client to be released on bail, stating that preparing a defense while she is in custody during the COVID-19 crisis is 'not realistic'. He also refutes the government's characterization of his client, explicitly stating she is 'not Jeffrey Epstein' and is being unfairly portrayed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014373.jpg
This document is a slide from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch financial conference held on November 17, 2016. It discusses the outlook for financial regulation following the 2016 GOP election, analyzes the CCAR stress tests, and presents opinions from panelist Mr. Cohen that regulation is the primary obstacle to bank M&A and activist investor influence. Despite the user's prompt, the document contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; its content is strictly focused on the financial services industry.
Applicability of precedent cases (Madoff, Dreier, Esposit...
Mr. Cohen cites several high-profile cases to argue for certain conditions. The Court questions the relevance of these cases, specifically asking if the defendants in those cases had substantial international connections. Mr. Cohen concedes they did not.
Argument for client's release on bail
Mr. Cohen argues for his client's release on bail, citing the Bail Reform Act, the difficulty of preparing a defense while she is in custody during the COVID crisis, and refuting the government's negative portrayal of her.
Final points regarding victim statements and the relevanc...
Mr. Cohen makes final arguments to the court, distinguishing the current case from U.S. v. Epstein. He argues that the Epstein case was about 'dangerousness,' a factor the government is not pursuing in the current matter.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity