📧 Communication

court testimony

Communication Details

From
To
["Berke"] ["Berke"]
Subject
Redirect Examination regarding Juror No. 1
Message Content

Mr. Shechtman questions the witness, Berke, about why no further investigation was conducted into a potential name match between Juror No. 1 and a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad. The witness confirms it was because they agreed, based on the voir dire, that it couldn't be the same person.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00010116.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a court transcript from March 22, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Berke by attorney Mr. Shechtman. The questioning centers on why Berke did not further investigate a potential name match between Juror No. 1 and a suspended lawyer, Catherine Conrad, with Berke stating it was concluded they were different people based on the voir dire. After the examination, the witness is excused, and the court asks if the defense, representing a defendant named Parse, has any more witnesses.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication