A speaker describes questioning someone about conversations with a person named Jane on three separate dates, during which Jane provided names and physical descriptions related to group sexualized massages.
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney argues to a judge that the government failed to properly investigate information provided by witnesses, which is probative of the defendant's innocence. The attorney cites the 'Watson case' as precedent where law enforcement prematurely concluded guilt and then begins to question a witness about conversations with a person named 'Jane' regarding 'group sexualized massages'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication