Unknown Questioner
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A series of three conversations with a person named Jane, where she provided information about gr... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Direct examination | A witness named Rocchio is questioned about the methodologies of research studies concerning offe... | Courtroom or deposition set... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Carolyn as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | A cross-examination of A. Farmer regarding a journal entry about a movie theater incident. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014918.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, showing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio describes various methodologies for conducting studies, such as interviewing offenders about their tactics, analyzing victims' experiences for treatment purposes, and surveying experts for consensus. The examination on this page concludes with a question about whether these studies use a consistent definition of 'grooming'.
DOJ-OGR-00008296.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in court on December 9, 2021. Maxwell is being questioned about a 'book' (likely a contact book) belonging to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding a large list of masseuses located in Florida. Maxwell claims the specific version of the book presented was created after her 'departure' and states she does not know the qualifications of the people listed, while her attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00018847.jpg
This page is a transcript from the cross-examination of a witness named 'Carolyn' in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The defense attorney attempts to impeach the witness's credibility by suggesting she has an incentive to lie and questioning her about schizophrenia and alleged past loss of child custody due to substance abuse, which the witness repeatedly denies. Prosecutor Ms. Comey objects to the line of questioning regarding the witness's incentive to stick to her story.
DOJ-OGR-00018402.jpg
This page is a transcript from the direct examination of a witness named Kate in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Kate testifies that she stopped spending time with Maxwell around age 24. She also details her past addiction to alcohol, cocaine, and sleeping pills, stating she achieved sobriety on May 1st, 2003, and affirms that her past substance use has not affected her memories.
DOJ-OGR-00016322.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer regarding a journal entry they made about a 'movie theater incident'. The questioner probes the witness's state of mind and their written description of the event, highlighting statements where the witness seemed to be rationalizing or justifying their experience.
DOJ-OGR-00013134.jpg
This document is page 121 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies about two specific incidents in a 'massage room' involving Jeffrey Epstein and two different unknown women (one blond with an accent, one brunette model). The testimony explicitly describes sexual acts, including oral sex and vaginal penetration by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013948.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa testifies that she worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002 and confirms she never saw Maxwell pregnant nor was told she was pregnant during that time. She also confirms having a videoconference with the government regarding the case in November 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00013699.jpg
This document is page 108 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding a journal entry she wrote in January 1996. The questioning focuses on how hindsight affects her perception of events that occurred in New Mexico and New York, specifically referencing a 'movie theater incident' involving an unnamed male ('him').
Group sexualized massages
A speaker describes questioning someone about conversations with a person named Jane on three separate dates, during which Jane provided names and physical descriptions related to group sexualized massages.
Discussion of Police Report content regarding Epstein and...
Witness confirms the report does not accuse Dershowitz of abuse, but details extensive abuse by Epstein (180 encounters in 6 months).
Methodologies for conducting studies on offenders, victim...
An unknown questioner asks Rocchio to provide examples of how studies are conducted. Rocchio describes methods like interviewing offenders, studying victims' experiences and treatment, and surveying experts. The questioner then asks about the definition of 'grooming' in these studies.
Her conduct, including in relation to minor victims
Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly lied repeatedly under oath when providing testimony in 2016 about her conduct.
Her conduct, including in relation to minor victims
Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly lied repeatedly under oath when providing testimony in 2016 about her conduct.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity