📧 Communication

comment

Communication Details

From
To
The Board (NLRB) The Board (NLRB)
Subject
Comment on proposed rule
Message Content

Argued that the Board improperly focused only on the cost of printing and posting the notice, ignoring the 'actual economic impact' such as increased unionization. Asserted the Board's RFA certification is invalid.

📄 Source Document

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022314.jpg
ESTATE Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) justification for a new rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights. The NLRB concludes the rule will not have a significant economic impact on small businesses, estimating the cost at $64.40, and refutes critical comments from organizations like Baker & Daniels LLP. Despite the user's prompt suggesting a link to Epstein, the document's content is exclusively about U.S. labor law and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication