The Board (NLRB)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Small Businesses
|
Regulator regulated |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Baker & Daniels LLP
|
Adversarial critical |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
CIA
|
Regulatory commenter |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Fisher and Phillips
|
Regulatory commenter |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Cass County Electric Cooperative
|
Adversarial critical |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Baker & McKenzie
|
Commenter on proposed rule |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
|
Commenter on proposed rule |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Employers
|
Regulatory |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Various employers, unions, and interest groups
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Government employees
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Commenting Organizations (e.g., Baker & McKenzie, Wiseda Corp.)
|
Regulatory procedural |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
COLLE
|
Regulatory commenter |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ALFA
|
Regulatory commenter |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
|
Regulatory commenter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pilchak attorneys
|
Rejection of proposal |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Governmental hierarchy |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author of the text
|
Disagreement opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Labor (DOL)
|
Contradiction |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) conducted a public comment period for a proposed employ... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Analysis of the rule's compliance costs under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, estimating a $64.40... | N/A | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of the NLRB's 'Rules and Regulations' in the Federal Register, responding to comments... | N/A | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of a final rule regarding employer notice-posting requirements in the Federal Register. | Federal Register | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of this document in the Federal Register, where the Board defends its new notice-post... | United States | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of a final rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in the Federal Register,... | United States | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final rule in the Federal Register regard... | United States | View |
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | Publication of rules and regulations in the Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 168. | United States | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB. The decision is cited in an argument regarding an emp... | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 1961-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. NLRB. The court rejected... | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
Comment on proposed rule
Argued that the NLRB 'quickly digresses' in its cost estimation for small businesses and mischaracterized the Board's reasoning for not using a tiered approach.
Comment on proposed rule
Argued that the Board improperly focused only on the cost of printing and posting the notice, ignoring the 'actual economic impact' such as increased unionization. Asserted the Board's RFA certification is invalid.
Comment on proposed rule
Argued that the NLRB 'quickly digresses' in its cost estimation for small businesses and mischaracterized the Board's reasoning for not using a tiered approach.
Comment on proposed rule
Argued that the Board improperly focused only on the cost of printing and posting the notice, ignoring the 'actual economic impact' such as increased unionization. Asserted the Board's RFA certification is invalid.
Amplifying the right to refrain from union activity
Suggested adding 'or not' after each enumerated right (e.g., 'you have the right to: form join or assist a union, or not.') to give equal weight to refraining from union activity.
Comment on proposed rule
Argued that the NLRB 'quickly digresses' in its cost estimation for small businesses and mischaracterized the Board's reasoning for not using a tiered approach.
Proposed rule on employee rights notices
The document discusses comments received by the NLRB regarding a proposed rule. The comments cover various communication methods for notifying employees, including text messaging, Twitter, faxing, voice mail, instant messaging, email, and intranet/internet postings. The NLRB's decisions on these matters are detailed.
Proposed rule on employee rights notices
The document discusses comments received by the NLRB regarding a proposed rule. The comments cover various communication methods for notifying employees, including text messaging, Twitter, faxing, voice mail, instant messaging, email, and intranet/internet postings. The NLRB's decisions on these matters are detailed.
Misleading language on collective-bargaining obligations
Argued that the notice fails to clarify that an employer is not obligated to consent to a collective-bargaining agreement, but only to bargain in good faith. Suggested the notice should state that the NLRA does not compel agreement or concessions.
Clarification of 'terms and conditions of employment'
Suggested adding the phrase 'including wages and benefits' to the right to discuss 'terms and conditions of employment' to ensure clarity, especially for employees unaware of their NLRA rights. The Board agreed with this suggestion.
Flaws in the 'Right To Strike and Picket' section
Argued that employees at a healthcare institution should be informed they do not have the right to strike unless the union provides a 10-day notice to the employer and mediation agencies.
Lack of prominence for the 'Right To Refrain From Union A...
Accused the Board of 'burying' the provision by placing it last and criticized its lack of prominence.
Comment on proposed rule
Argued that the Board improperly focused only on the cost of printing and posting the notice, ignoring the 'actual economic impact' such as increased unionization. Asserted the Board's RFA certification is invalid.
Comments on a proposed rule regarding workplace notice po...
Organizations submitted comments arguing against the proposed rule, citing concerns about compliance costs, legal fees, vague requirements for electronic posting, and potential litigation.
Comment on proposed rule
Argued that the proposed notice would create 'Unnecessary Confusion and Conflict in the Workplace' and was disrespectful to non-union employers.
Comment on proposed rule
Asserted that the notice would create costs related to training and lost work time for answering employee questions.
Comment on proposed rule
Disputed the Board's conclusion that the posting requirement was exempt from the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
Economic Impact of Final Rule
The Board certified that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Comments on a proposed rule regarding workplace notice po...
Organizations submitted comments arguing against the proposed rule, citing concerns about compliance costs, legal fees, vague requirements for electronic posting, and potential litigation.
Comments on a proposed rule regarding workplace notice po...
Organizations submitted comments arguing against the proposed rule, citing concerns about compliance costs, legal fees, vague requirements for electronic posting, and potential litigation.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on notice-posting re...
Multiple entities submitted comments on the proposed rule. Some criticized it for its lack of contemporaneity with the NLRA's enactment. The Teamsters supported it, while the Motor and Equipment Manufacturers Association argued against it.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity