📧 Communication

letter

Communication Details

From
Subject
Reconsideration of response
Message Content

Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00021867.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This page is from a legal opinion (likely the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, given the citations) affirming a District Court's denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion. Maxwell argued that testimony regarding sexual abuse in New Mexico constituted a 'constructive amendment' or 'prejudicial variance' from the original indictment, violating the Fifth Amendment. The court reviews the denial *de novo* and rejects Maxwell's argument.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication