U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
PersonRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00014875.jpg
This document is page 25 of a legal opinion (likely from a Court of Appeals) affirming the sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court upholds the District Court's application of a 'leadership enhancement' to her sentence and validates the court's reasoning regarding the gravity of her conduct and her pivotal role in facilitating the abuse of underage girls. It references specific sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and mentions an individual named Kellen in the context of where the abuse occurred.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $750,000.00 | Fine imposed by District Court | View |
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $300.00 | Mandatory special assessment | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Received | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
| 2020-12-15 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | U.S. District Cou... | $28,500,000.00 | Proposed bail application offering mentioned by... | View |
| 2016-06-20 | Received | Jane Doe | U.S. District Cou... | $400.00 | Filing Fee for Complaint (Receipt Number 0208-1... | View |
Flashlight checks on Ms. Maxwell.
In a letter, the government admitted that Ms. Maxwell is the only inmate who receives targeted flashlight checks every 15 minutes.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com provided for Christian R. Everdell, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
No Subject
The document mentions the District Court's response to a jury note as a point of appeal, which was found not to have resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address jpagliuca@hmflaw.com provided for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address lmenninger@hmflaw.com provided for Laura A. Menninger, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address mcohen@cohengresser.com provided for Mark Stewart Cohen, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address bc@sternheimlaw.com provided for Bobbi C Sternheim, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Unknown
Referenced in point 4 regarding the court's response not resulting in constructive amendment.
Unknown legal query
Referenced in appeal point (4) regarding the court's response resulting in a constructive amendment.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Unknown
Jury note referenced in appeal point (4) regarding constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Clarification on Count Four
Ambiguous note referring to the second element of Count Four of the Indictment.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Reconsideration of District Court's response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Unknown inquiry
Jury note sent to the court.
Juror 50's public statements
Requesting that the District Court conduct a hearing.
Request to question Juror 50
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Treatment of Maxwell
Admonished MDC to ensure Maxwell is subjected only to necessary security protocols.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Question regarding Count Four (4) of the Indictment
Under Count Four (4), if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?
Racketeering
A complaint alleged that Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, Rodriguez, and Marcinkova engaged in a pattern of racketeering involving luring minor children for money.
Racketeering
A complaint alleged that Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, Rodriguez, and Marcinkova engaged in a pattern of racketeering involving luring minor children for money.
Clarification on Indictment
An ambiguous jury note was analyzed to see if it implied a constructive amendment. The court found it clearly referred to the second element of Count Four of the Indictment.
MDC’s nighttime security checks
An additional letter briefing was submitted to the District Court regarding nighttime security checks at the MDC, which Maxwell cited as a new event to justify reversing a prior decision.
Referred to the second element of Count Four of the Indic...
An ambiguous note from the jury was determined by the District Court to clearly refer to a specific element of the indictment, and the court directed the jury accordingly.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity