📧 Communication
Cross-examination testimonyCommunication Details
From
Unnamed Questioner (Q)
Linked to Unnamed Questioner (Q)
To
Berke (A)
Berke (A)
Subject
Attorney's obligations regarding juror misconduct
Message Content
An unnamed questioner cross-examines Berke about the professional obligations an attorney has to the court if they form a belief that a juror has engaged in misconduct. Berke states they believe they would have an obligation to tell the court but would first research the rules and law.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00009432.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of an individual named Berke, filed on February 24, 2022. Berke, an attorney, is questioned about their professional obligations upon learning of potential juror misconduct. Berke affirms a belief in the obligation to report such information to the court, but emphasizes they would first thoroughly research the applicable rules and laws to ensure full compliance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication