| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Aznaran (A)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS (Espinosa)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Interviewer interviewee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness/Juror (A)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal testimony | A witness (A) is questioned (by Q) about the decision not to investigate potential juror Catherin... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness is being questioned about Jeffrey Epstein's use of masseuses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or interview where a witness is questioned about prior statements to law enforcement... | undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or court hearing is being conducted, as evidenced by the Q&A format and presence of ... | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Kate, where she is questioned about a conversation with Max... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | A witness is being deposed, questioned about their preparation and prior statements. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | An unnamed witness is being deposed. They are asked about their preparation for the deposition, t... | Undisclosed deposition loca... | View |
| N/A | Testimony / deposition | G. Maxwell is questioned about her work for Jeffrey, providing contact information, and her knowl... | Court or legal proceeding | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of a witness named Jane regarding exhibits, including her signature, photograph... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of a witness named Visoski regarding the responsibilities of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Carolyn regarding her lawsuits against Epstein and Kellen and her cl... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' regarding her prior statements about a meeting with Epstein. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A witness, Mr. Alessi, is questioned about a book (Government Exhibit 52A). An objection by Mr. P... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of a witness named McHugh regarding financial accounts. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Espinosa regarding evidence, specifically an envelope (CE3) and a p... | Courtroom (implied by context) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony / cross-examination | A cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her contact with other alleged victims of J... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Chapell in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of Mr. Alessi, where he is asked to review a multi-page document and state wha... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Direct testimony of a witness named Espinosa in court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Chapell regarding the sender and recipient information on a ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-03-24 | Deposition | Redirect examination of a witness named Brune regarding information found in an email and a Westl... | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Hearing | A court hearing was held where a witness/juror was questioned about their answers on a previously... | open court | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Deposition/interview | An unnamed individual is questioned about their knowledge of interactions between their father an... | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Deposition | A deposition or interview is being conducted with an unnamed witness. | N/A | View |
An email dated February 7, 2020, between USANYS personnel containing a transcript of a Q&A session. The text discusses the post-death investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, with an official confirming that the investigation is moving forward to target co-conspirators who assisted him.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an unnamed witness describes their professional relationship with Elaine Maxwell, identifying her as their direct boss and the manager of all of Mr. Epstein's worldwide households. The witness also confirms that Ms. Maxwell was Mr. Epstein's girlfriend.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. The speaker describes living in an apartment in a house in 2001, the presence of photographs of girls around the house, and a recent phone call to "Mr. Epstein," whom they call "Jeffrey." The speaker initiated the call out of fear of an investigation following a recent "fallout" between them.
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a witness or potential juror regarding a jury selection questionnaire they completed on November 4, 2021. The inquiry specifically focuses on question 48, which pertains to whether the individual, their friends, or family have ever been victims of sexual harassment or assault.
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or interview from July 26, 2017. An unnamed individual is questioned about their knowledge of a relationship and potential financial transactions between their father and Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly. The speaker denies any personal contact with Connolly, denies being offered money, and claims to have limited knowledge of his father's interactions with the reporter, stating they only knew of a single phone call that occurred a year or two prior.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript, likely written by Alan Dershowitz (based on biographical details such as attending Talmudical Academy and Brooklyn College). The text recounts the narrator's high school years in Brooklyn, including his reputation as a 'bad kid,' playing varsity basketball against Ralph Lauren (then Lipschitz), and interacting with Brooklyn Dodgers players near Ebbets Field. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry.
This document is page 77 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. An unidentified witness states that they were prepared for the deposition by Mr. Leopold that same morning. The witness also confirms reading their prior statement to the police, clarifying it was a narrative-style police report, which they reviewed a few days before the deposition.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned. The witness denies knowing Detective Recarey or speaking with anyone else who had been to Epstein's house. The witness also denies that they or their parents consulted with any law firms other than that of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold, and confirms they did speak with someone in preparation for the deposition.
This document is a transcript from a deposition, likely dated September 29, 2010, where an individual is questioned about their knowledge of a financial arrangement between Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly and their father. The interviewee admits to being generally aware that they 'talked' but denies knowing any details of the arrangement or if any money was actually exchanged.
This document is page 66 of a deposition or interview transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about their family and connections related to the Epstein case. The witness clarifies that 'Paul' is their mother's husband, not their sister's boyfriend, and confirms they have spoken with a 'Brett [REDACTED]' who knows the basics about an unspecified incident that occurred at Mr. Epstein's house.
This document is page 57 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her past. She states she got a belly piercing at age 14 and met Epstein around her 14th or 15th birthday. The witness denies accusations of lying about her age to get piercings or to enter bars using fake driver's licenses.
This document is page 38 of a deposition transcript from 2008, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012433'. An unnamed witness denies the interviewer's suggestion that they discussed being 'entitled to money from Mr. Epstein' with federal prosecutors and also denies knowing Marie Villafona. The witness does confirm that four federal agents, believed to be from the FBI, visited their home once around 2006 or 2007.
This document is a page from a legal transcript where a witness is questioned about a prior statement given to the police and Michelle Pagan. The witness clarifies that her initial statement of not being touched by 'Jeff' was not 'fully truthful,' and now states that he did touch her legs and 'never kept his hands to himself,' while still denying any form of sexual intercourse.
This document is a two-page transcript from a deposition or interview where an unidentified witness is questioned about interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms she told 'Jeff' (presumably Epstein) that she was 18 and later discussed this with Detective Michelle Pagan of the Palm Beach Police Department. However, she denies remembering specific details, such as telling the detective she said her age 'really fast' to conceal the lie.
This document is a fragment of a legal deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012421'. In it, an unidentified witness states they visited Jeffrey Epstein's house only once, three years prior, and had never met or spoken to him before that visit. The witness denies ever telling Epstein they were under 18 and denies being contacted or coerced into sexual activity by anyone associated with Epstein via phone or the internet.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated April 25, 2007. An unnamed witness, questioned by Ms. Bilafonia, is asked about bringing approximately 30 women to an unspecified location and about potential drug use. The witness denies knowing the exact number of women and vehemently denies any personal drug use or knowledge of drug or alcohol use by the women, calling the allegations 'ridiculous'.
This document is a transcript from a 2007 interview where an unnamed witness describes her interactions with an unnamed male when she was 16. She states that she repeatedly refused his offers to take her to New York to 'fulfill her dreams' because of her age. The witness also mentions that after she became pregnant and had a baby, their communication ceased.
This document is page 11 of a deposition transcript dated April 25, 2007, from a House Oversight investigation. An unnamed woman describes giving 'Jeffrey' (presumably Epstein) his first massage, recounting a conversation where she brought up that she heard he liked topless massages and stating she 'willingly took it off'. She details that Jeffrey was initially clothed before getting on the massage table under a towel and that they talked to get to know each other during the session.
This document is page 18 of a deposition transcript where a witness describes Jeffrey Epstein's operational methods. The witness states her belief that Epstein used other girls as intermediaries to recruit women and to distance himself from potential legal trouble, noting that these girls instructed her to lie to Epstein about her age so that, from his perspective, everyone was over 18.
This document is page 15 of a deposition transcript where an individual is questioned about their interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The interviewee denies ever contacting law enforcement and states that neither Epstein nor his associates contacted them after a 'massage,' with the exception of their best friend (whose name is redacted). The interviewee clarifies that their friend's inquiry about 'going back' was a personal conversation and not an official request on behalf of Mr. Epstein.
This document is page 13 of a deposition transcript from Onsor & Associates. In it, an unnamed witness is questioned about a physical encounter with 'Mr. Epstein,' stating they only massaged his back, chest, and thighs. The witness explicitly denies that Epstein touched his own penis, masturbated, or that any form of sexual contact, including oral sex or penetration, occurred between them.
This is page 8 of a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned about their interactions related to Mr. Epstein. The witness denies any prior e-mail or phone contact and states that no one persuaded them to engage in sexual activity with Mr. Epstein before visiting his house. The witness recounts being told that Mr. Epstein might ask them to do "other things" and that it was their choice to accept or decline.
This document is page 7 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about an arrangement to give Mr. Epstein a massage. The witness states that a trusted female friend (name redacted) assured her it would be a 'straight, legitimate massage' with no sexual contact. The witness, who had no prior contact with anyone from Epstein's circle, agreed to the arrangement due to financial difficulties, stating she needed to 'clear my bank account up'.
This document is page 6 of a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness describes their introduction to Mr. Epstein. The witness states they had no prior contact with Epstein via phone, email, or internet, and that they learned of him through a redacted individual. The witness recalls being told they would be paid either one hundred or two hundred dollars for a half-hour meeting.
The entire document is a transcript of a question-and-answer session.
The entire document is a transcript of a Q&A session where the witness is questioned about their knowledge of and interactions with various people connected to the Epstein case.
The entire document is a transcript of a question-and-answer session.
An unnamed questioner cross-examines Berke about the professional obligations an attorney has to the court if they form a belief that a juror has engaged in misconduct. Berke states they believe they would have an obligation to tell the court but would first research the rules and law.
The questioner establishes the timeline of Jane hiring two personal injury lawyers, Mr. Glassman and Mr. Werksman, shortly before her first meeting with the government in September 2019, and questions her choice of lawyers.
A recorded Q&A session where a witness is questioned about their physical interaction with Mr. Epstein.
The document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness is being questioned.
The entire document is a transcript of a question-and-answer session.
A questioner asks the witness, Kate, about who else she saw at Maxwell's London townhouse besides Epstein. Kate describes seeing a seventeen-year-old girl having tea with Ghislaine.
An unnamed questioner asks the witness, Kate, about how often she saw Epstein and Maxwell over a period of several years, following an incident of sexual acts during massages at Maxwell's house in London.
An unnamed questioner is examining a witness, Ms. Brune, about why she and her team did not conduct additional research on a potential juror whose name matched a name in a New York court opinion prior to voir dire.
A question-and-answer session where Q questions A about their knowledge of another person involved in the Epstein case, who is also represented by A's lawyer, Mr. Herman.
A question-and-answer session where Q questions A about their knowledge of another person involved in the Epstein case, who is also represented by A's lawyer, Mr. Herman.
A question-and-answer session where Q questions A about their knowledge of another person involved in the Epstein case, who is also represented by A's lawyer, Mr. Herman.
A question-and-answer session where Q questions A about their knowledge of another person involved in the Epstein case, who is also represented by A's lawyer, Mr. Herman.
A question-and-answer session where Q questions A about their knowledge of another person involved in the Epstein case, who is also represented by A's lawyer, Mr. Herman.
A question-and-answer session where the witness is questioned about prior statements she made to Epstein, his assistant, and Detective Michelle Pagan regarding her age and background.
A question-and-answer session where Q questions A about their knowledge of another person involved in the Epstein case, who is also represented by A's lawyer, Mr. Herman.
The entire document is a transcript of a Q&A session where the witness is questioned about their knowledge of and interactions with various people connected to the Epstein case.
The document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness is being questioned.
The entire document is a transcript of a Q&A session where the witness is questioned about their knowledge of and interactions with various people connected to the Epstein case.
A questioner asks the witness, Kate, about who else she saw at Maxwell's London townhouse besides Epstein. Kate describes seeing a seventeen-year-old girl having tea with Ghislaine.
An unnamed questioner is cross-examining a witness (Rocchio) about an article the witness provided to the government as support for their testimony. The questioning focuses on the witness's opinion of the authors (Winters and Jeglic) and the details of the study described in the article.
An unnamed questioner asks the witness, Rocchio, to respond to the assertion that the targeting of vulnerable children for sexual abuse is 'clinical lore' not based on empirical data. Rocchio refutes this, stating there are multiple data sources to substantiate the phenomenon.
A questioner asks Rodgers about the process of identifying and logging passengers on Mr. Epstein's planes. Rodgers explains that they didn't always know passengers' names and would use the abbreviation 'PAX' in the logbook, sometimes noting gender. Rodgers confirms they would not retroactively add a name if it was learned on a later flight.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity