A legal argument submitted by Neil S. Binder to the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, requesting that grand jury transcripts remain sealed or be heavily redacted to protect the privacy and reputation of innocent nonparties, arguing their privacy interests outweigh public disclosure.
This legal document, filed on August 6, 2025, by Neil S. Binder of the law firm Binder & Schwartz, is a submission to the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document argues that grand jury transcripts should remain sealed or be released with significant redactions to protect innocent third parties from reputational harm, especially given what is described as relentless and inaccurate press coverage. The core argument is that the privacy interests of these nonparties outweigh the public's interest in disclosure.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication