Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Neil S. Binder

Person
Mentions
4
Relationships
0
Events
1
Documents
2
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2025-08-06 Legal filing Filing of Document 804 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, arguing for the sealing or redaction of court r... The court handling Case 1:2... View

DOJ-OGR-00015122.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 6, 2025, by Neil S. Binder of the law firm Binder & Schwartz, is a submission to the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document argues that grand jury transcripts should remain sealed or be released with significant redactions to protect innocent third parties from reputational harm, especially given what is described as relentless and inaccurate press coverage. The core argument is that the privacy interests of these nonparties outweigh the public's interest in disclosure.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015118.jpg

This is a legal letter from Neil S. Binder of Binder & Schwartz LLP to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case United States v. Maxwell. The letter, submitted under seal, addresses the DOJ's motion to unseal grand jury materials that reference the firm's client (whose name is redacted), arguing for the continued maintenance of grand jury secrecy based on established precedent and the lack of justification for special circumstances.

Legal correspondence / letter to judge
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
0
Total
1

Argument to keep grand jury transcripts sealed or redacted

From: Neil S. Binder
To: ["The Court"]

A legal argument submitted by Neil S. Binder to the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, requesting that grand jury transcripts remain sealed or be heavily redacted to protect the privacy and reputation of innocent nonparties, arguing their privacy interests outweigh public disclosure.

Legal filing
2025-08-06
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search