📧 Communication
legal documentCommunication Details
A legal argument asserting that extrinsic evidence is permissible to prove a witness's (Jane's) prior statement because she denied its substance during testimony, despite acknowledging the '3500 material' reflected it. The document also notes that counsel missed a deadline to identify all such statements.
📄 Source Document
This legal document, dated December 15, 2021, is an argument from Ms. Maxwell's counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial testimony of a witness named 'Jane'. Counsel argues that because Jane denied the substance of a prior statement in court, they should be allowed to introduce extrinsic evidence to prove that statement under Federal Rule of Evidence 613, citing legal precedent. The document concludes by noting that due to time constraints, counsel was unable to meet a 10:15 p.m. deadline to list all such disputed statements.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication