Ms. Maxwell’s Counsel
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-15 | Deadline | A deadline of 10:15 p.m. for Ms. Maxwell's counsel to indicate each disputed prior inconsistent s... | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Meeting | Defense counsel had an in-person meeting with the government. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001124.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that she was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she intentionally moved to New Hampshire to be within driving distance of New York prosecutors and that her legal counsel was in regular, documented contact with the government for months. The filing aims to counter the government's portrayal of her as a fugitive by demonstrating her intent to remain in the U.S. and face any potential charges.
DOJ-OGR-00001098.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing, specifically a memorandum in support of reconsidering a bail decision for Ms. Maxwell. The arguments outlined focus on her strong family ties in the United States, her willingness to provide financial transparency, and refuting the government's claims that she was a flight risk or was hiding prior to her arrest. The filing also asserts that she has waived extradition rights and that the proposed bail package is more than sufficient to ensure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001974.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated December 14, 2020. The filing argues for the reconsideration of a court's bail decision concerning Ms. Maxwell, proposing she be granted bail under strict conditions. The arguments outlined include her deep family ties, her devotion to her spouse, financial transparency, and claims that she was not hiding from authorities but rather protecting herself from media and physical threats.
DOJ-OGR-00020042.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she intentionally moved to New Hampshire to be within driving distance of New York prosecutors and that her defense counsel was in regular communication with the government for months. The filing aims to counter the government's portrayal of her as a fugitive who was hiding and changing locations.
Pre-arrest communication
The document states that Ms. Maxwell's counsel was in regular contact with the government prior to her arrest.
Contact prior to arrest
The document states that Ms. Maxwell's counsel was in regular contact with the government before her arrest.
Admissibility of extrinsic evidence to prove a witness's ...
A legal argument asserting that extrinsic evidence is permissible to prove a witness's (Jane's) prior statement because she denied its substance during testimony, despite acknowledging the '3500 material' reflected it. The document also notes that counsel missed a deadline to identify all such statements.
Ms. Maxwell's case
Defense counsel was in regular contact with the government via email, phone, and in-person meetings. A meeting occurred in March 2020.
Ms. Maxwell's case
Defense counsel was in regular contact with the government via email, phone, and in-person meetings. A meeting occurred in January 2020.
Ms. Maxwell's case
Defense counsel was in regular contact with the government via email, phone, and in-person meetings. A meeting occurred in September 2019.
Ms. Maxwell's case
Defense counsel was in regular contact with the government via email, phone, and in-person meetings. A meeting occurred in October 2019.
Ms. Maxwell's case
Defense counsel was in regular contact with the government via email, phone, and in-person meetings starting from Epstein's arrest. A meeting occurred in July 2019.
Ms. Maxwell's case
Defense counsel was in regular contact with the government via email, phone, and in-person meetings. A meeting occurred in August 2019.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity