Attorneys and the judge discuss the relevance and scheduling of a witness named Kelly from the Nags Head Pub in the U.K. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) objects due to lack of prior information, and the court expresses surprise at learning about this witness for the first time.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and attorneys about a witness named Kelly. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, introduces a witness from the 'Nags Head Pub' in the U.K., while the opposing counsel, Ms. Comey, objects, stating they have received no prior information and cannot agree to a stipulation. The judge expresses frustration at hearing about this subpoenaed witness for the first time during the trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication