This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and attorneys about a witness named Kelly. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, introduces a witness from the 'Nags Head Pub' in the U.K., while the opposing counsel, Ms. Comey, objects, stating they have received no prior information and cannot agree to a stipulation. The judge expresses frustration at hearing about this subpoenaed witness for the first time during the trial.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, questioning the attorneys about a witness.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, discussing a witness from the U.K.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, stating they have no materials about the witness and cannot stipulate.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, identifying the witness as Kelly.
|
| Kelly | Witness |
A witness from the Nags Head Pub in the U.K. whose testimony is being discussed.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Nags Head Pub | company |
The location associated with a witness who is to come from the U.K.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The country from which a witness is expected to travel.
|
"The one who can only come from the U.K. on Monday. I'm not talking about the marshals issue, I'm talking about the witness from the Nags Head Pub."Source
"With respect to the marshal issue, we received absolutely no materials from the defense about statements that this witness has made, we have no idea what this witness would say on the stand, so we would not be able to stipulate to anything."Source
"Which witness have you subpoenaed but heard nothing from for weeks that I'm hearing about for the first time?"Source
"Her name is Kelly."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,340 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document