Defense argument regarding the NPA, the age of the alleged conduct (1994-1997), lack of physical evidence, and request for bail.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues for bail, claiming the government's indictment of conduct from 1994-1997 is tactical and lacks physical evidence like tapes or video. He asserts that the client has been kept in custody 'by design' and references the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication